Political Globalization
1. Summary
INTRODUCTION
Political globalization can be understood as a tension between three processes which interact to produce the complex field of global politics: global geopolitics, global normative culture and polycentric networks. The first dimension of political globalization is the geopolitics of global power. The second dimension represents the rise of the global norm culture. This is widespread in global political communication. Political communication has become the basis of the global normative culture, and the global normative culture has come to exist amid tension with the state. The global civil society has sprung up around various kinds of social movements. The hallmark of the global civil society is that it has a lot of space, which has become multi-psychological since there are no diverse organizational principles. Because they are all products of globalization, and because they are interrelated, three dimensions of globalization do not exist separately. Globalization may strengthen democracy and divide democracy by changing the autonomy of capitalism.
THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE NATION-STATE, NATIONALITY AND CITIZENSHIP
Under the conditions of economic globalization, the nation-state changed. Countries must share sovereignty with non-governing actors in order to control the rival company, which leads to multi-governance. As a result, there are two issues: 'transnationalization enhances the power of a nation-state' and 'the rise of a regulated state.' transnationalization is a regulated governance rather than a loss of sovereignty. Various functions are being carried out transnationally through cooperation with other countries. What's important here is "transformation of the country." The public of a nation is very important, the state and the people have important differences in the context of political globalization, and the two must be distinguished. States are centres of the monopoly of legitimate violence in a given territory while nationstates refer to the coincidence of the state with a defined political community.
THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE AND COMMUNICATION
Communication is central to politics. nation-state are based on centralized communication systems such as state-run newspapers and media, while political parties have been the center of political communication. Today's public is centered on professional political communication and public persuasion with a "new public." According to Habermas, communication is not completely controlled by the state, and public spheres are the scene of politics and the process of discourse. These arguments relate to the national public spheres. What is important in the global public sphere as a transnational space is the manifestation of public discourse. The global public plays an important role in the context and structure of political communication and public discourse. Political globalization is most visible in terms of changes in political communication and in the wider transformation of the public sphere. It is possible to speak of a communicative kind of political globalization confronting economic globalization.
THE CENTRALITY OF CIVIL SOCIETY
Political globalization leads transnational, global communities, global networks, etc., and what is important in understanding these is the idea of civil society. The civil socialization of politics explains the change of the nation's state as a site for political struggle. In the process of political globalization, The world civil society is defined as an area that broadens the global scope, engages in problem-solving social movements, and challenges the hegemonic system of world capitalism, establishes cross-border communication, and organizes on the basis of super-permanent solidarity. The world civil society is considered a natural domain, and markets are considered artificial and artificial. The centrality of the world civil society lies in the establishment of a multidisciplinary governing mechanism, transnational movement to obtain more territorial organization and the emergence of networks.
THE TRANSFORMATION OF SPACES AND BORDERS
Since the spatial dynamism of political globalization exists in various interpretations associated with the globalization process, we must reconsider the role and meaning of borders and spaces. The relationship between globalization and new political spaces and borders revolves around two key spatial dynamics. The first is Castells' argument that network societies are constructed by the space of place and the space of flow that exists with tension. The second is Beck's argument that globalization is changing the nature of the nation and society, and that it has a new meaning. Globalization gave the region a new role, strengthened the inter-state network, brought awareness of international space, and made it realize that space is a component of social and political relations. The mastery of space has become the core of the political community. In a nation-state, borders are regarded as the mechanisms, of a country that works to create a territory capable of governing. In other words, under the conditions of globalization, the quantitative relationship between borders and territories was reversed.
CONCLUSION
The universalization of a nationally embedded model of democracy, the beginning of a normative global culture and the ‘civil societalization’ of governance are complex and sometimes contradictory. And one can find the three dilemmas of this complex relationship and the implications for autonomy and fragmentation. The universalization of a nationally embedded model of democracy, the beginning of a normative global culture and the ‘civil societalization’ of governance are complex and sometimes contradictory. And one can find the three dilemmas of this complex relationship and the implications for autonomy and fragmentation. First, the globalization of the nation-state and institutionalized governance model have given form to the aspirations for democracy. Democracy is universally wanted by people, but it is not trusted because it is not formal and authentic. Second, the world norm culture creates the possibility of a new community of destiny in the process. Third, the development of various networks and the world civil society creates new opportunities with autonomy, awareness of governance, but at the same time creates instability and danger.
2. Interesting point
It was interesting to see that the participation of citizens in political activities in the process of political globalization had a huge impact on the nation. It was also interesting that the phrase "democracy is generally the type of politics people want, but not trusted" was contrary to my opinion.
3. Discussion
The various networks and the development of the world's citizens cause instability and danger, but how should transnationalization proceed to address these problems?
No comments:
Post a Comment