Summary
The above article talks about the connection between globalization and culture. According to the passage above, globalization is a multidimensional process that takes place simultaneously in changes in economy, politics, technology development, environmental change and culture. And in modern society, globalization means a network of interconnectedness and interdependence that characterizes material, social, economic and cultural life, rapidly developing and constantly developing. They also say that culture is about creating meaning in life. Interpreting cultural meaning continues to motivate and orient people individually and collectively to specific choices and actions. Thus, from a cultural perspective, it is very basic to understand the agenda of globalization.
There is speculation that the globalization process will lead to a single world culture, according to the article. But you can't dare claim this speculation. This is because speculation about the spread of globalization must certainly be tempered by the many offset trends toward social, political and genuine cultural divisions seen around us. We therefore need to verify it by saying that she-gyetization is an unfair process. Nevertheless, the trend continues to drive globalization to "single globalization." This trend implies a form of cultural imperialism. The writer, however, says that when analyzing culture, the focus should be on interpreting the marketing capabilities of Western companies and the meanings associated with cultural products, not the ability to dominate the wide market.
Unlike the method through macro-analysis of globalization, the concept of "externalization," a way of understanding the effects of globalization felt within a certain region, is emerging. Desiccated soil means the reach of connectivity to the locality in which everyday life is carried out and experienced. Retro-naturalization is not simply about losing the experience of local culture. It makes locality, idiosyncrasies, nuances, differences suddenly and completely disappear. De-zeroing occurs in complex economic, political and technological elements, and in fact, as globalization itself, it is not a phenomenon that can be conveniently tied to one analytical dimension. But since it extends into the realm of historically unprecedented connectivity, there is one element worth screening for closer scrutiny. It is that we routinely rely on electronic media and communications technology and systems.
The above article presents various concepts of globalization and culture. It also explains what we need to share deeply and what we need to be wary of.
Mention of any new, interesting, or unusual items learned
It was interesting to compare views between those who view globalization as a threat to cultural identity and those who do not. Looking at the views of those who claim that globalization has been the most important force in creating and spreading cultural identity, and those who view it as a threat to cultural identity, I thought about whether preserving cultural identity is important or expanding it in modern society.
Identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more.
I wonder what path we can offer to solve the problem of cultural identity formation.
No comments:
Post a Comment