Globalization is a general, concrete concept to deal with the views of every part of the world. Despite efforts to analyse the concept of globalization objectively and systematically, it tends to be rejected and unacceptable by different perspectives around the world. Therefore, many scholars study about globalizations in the plural. Velho (1997) has spoken of globalization as an object, a perspective and a horizon. This can address globalization objectively and extensively. Many sociological approaches were ignored as the capitalist approach of globalization was focused. The approach developed for this phenomenon was very multi-dimensional and ideological.
It is common to think that the function of globalization lies in connectivity. people who focus on connectivity tend to neglect subjective and cultural factors. However, both connectivity and consciousness have to be unravelled.
Bush's proclamation is completely opposed to Huntington's paper on the clash of civilizations. Huntington said the civilisation dispute stems, among other things, from differences in concepts about the nature and purpose of human life. Therefore, it is a very big mistake to overlook the cultural aspect of globalization.
There are three main dimension in globalization It is economic, policy and cultural. From a cultural point of view, Ritzer has the concept of McDonaldization. This refers to the spread of certain social and economic practices from cultural powers to other countries by big businesses such as McDonald's and Nike. The gist of cultural and economic views on globalization is that the expansion of capitalism, ironically, affects cultural expansion. Also, globalization has been dealt with a lot by sociologists, but ironically it has been rather left relatively unattended by sociologists. However, social interaction and spread of communication played an important role in the globalization process, and it is difficult to imagine connectivity without them. In sum major dimensions of globalization are indeed the cultural, the social, the political and the economic. And there is no need to say what is more important.
The issue of the form (or the pattern) of globalization was raised most by Immanuel Wallerstein(1974, 1980, 1989). From his point of view, the present world society, the global region, etc. were achieved by the expansion of capitalism. As for the form of globalization, we see that forms have different dimensions and sides, and that the process of globalization is effective in adapting to certain forms and in general ways.
First, the national anthem should be viewed as part of the globalization process. The debates about their identities are important things that show the importance of a nation-state in the process of globalization. Second,, it can be excluded from global change through the personalization process from global change. Self-identity is differentiated through various expressions, and one can find a fusion of similarity and uniqueness. Finally, we pay attention to the components of mankind, which are themeized in many ways, resulting in many problems.
GLOCALIZATION is a central concept in the recent discussion of globalization. It is necessary and considered to respond globally to regional situations. Sociology has said that spreading ideas and practices mean spreading from one region to another, and it is recognized that broadening of these means becoming globalized. Globalization flows in the direction of identity. But some people talk about a globalized world, which is just self-limitization. In that all ideas and practices coincide, and a unified force arises, globalization inherently limits itself.
Many historians and sociologists have great interest in the age of world connectivity and world consciousness. As such, history is mentioned a lot in the process of analyzing globalization, and the relationship between globalization and history develops. Typically, group members argue about the history of ethnic, national and regional groups in search of their true identity. By mapping the steps of globalization, we can see that globalization is a historical problem, leading to a new understanding of globalization.
Globalization consists mainly of two directions, which increases the connectivity of the world and the consciousness of the world. Globalization has a special form for meaning and purpose, and has four criteria. : nation-states; world politics; individuals; and humankind. Globalization is organized by many aspects, including culture, society, politics and economy, and these aspects are closely related to each other. Also most important is not to embody globalization. Recognizing the conceptual state of globalization is paramount. To the question 'what is globalization?' globalization is so inclusive that it cannot give a clear answer.
2) mention of interesting items
It was amazing that the word and concept of globalization had been mentioned very long ago. I thought that study and discussion on globalization had been made recently, that is, since the 1990s, when the Internet emerged, in earnest, and the boundaries between countries became blurred. However, it was very interesting that many scholars studied and discussed globalization before then. I also thought that globalization was closely related to cultural and social factors, but after reading this article, I found that economic also had a very big impact. So it was very interesting that there was a difference in understanding and concepts of globalization between developed and developing countries and I thought about 'globalization' one more time.
3) question(a debatable thing)
The fact that globalization is not concrete and generally undefined seems to give the concept of 'globalization' too much ambiguity. All words and concepts may differ from individual to individual acceptance. I think "globalization" is also one of them, There were doubts about the saying that globalization is a self-limiting process because it is a unified force of thought and practice, and that a globalized world is impossible world.
They also wondered if it was possible to recognize a conceptual state without recognizing an an ontological matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment